Talk Description
432Q - Research Paper
Abstract
Aim:
We aimed to evaluate the effects of AVF dysfunction and repeated surgical interventions on the quality of life of haemodialysis patients, and to identify strategies that balance maintaining quality of life and prolonging life.
Method:
This project utilised patient surveys to assess the impact of AVF dysfunction and the frequency of surgical interventions on quality of life. The rationale was that these interventions could potentially address the identified problems by reducing complications and enhancing patient well-being.
Results:
The surveys revealed four main themes: the effects of dialysis, treatment priorities, consequences of frequent surgeries, and satisfaction with AVFs. Dialysis mainly impacted patients' independence. Survival was the top priority for patients, followed by a desire to reduce dialysis sessions. The major issue with repeated surgeries was the disruption of daily activities. In terms of AVF satisfaction, the main problem was its failure, and the most frequent complaint was pain during use.
Conclusion:
The findings support the notion that minimising AVF complications and the need for repeated surgeries can significantly enhance the quality of life for haemodialysis patients. This project underscores the importance of considering patient well-being alongside the extension of life. Future directions include broader implementation of less invasive techniques and ongoing evaluation of their impact on patient outcomes.
Abstract
Aim:
We aimed to evaluate the effects of AVF dysfunction and repeated surgical interventions on the quality of life of haemodialysis patients, and to identify strategies that balance maintaining quality of life and prolonging life.
Method:
This project utilised patient surveys to assess the impact of AVF dysfunction and the frequency of surgical interventions on quality of life. The rationale was that these interventions could potentially address the identified problems by reducing complications and enhancing patient well-being.
Results:
The surveys revealed four main themes: the effects of dialysis, treatment priorities, consequences of frequent surgeries, and satisfaction with AVFs. Dialysis mainly impacted patients' independence. Survival was the top priority for patients, followed by a desire to reduce dialysis sessions. The major issue with repeated surgeries was the disruption of daily activities. In terms of AVF satisfaction, the main problem was its failure, and the most frequent complaint was pain during use.
Conclusion:
The findings support the notion that minimising AVF complications and the need for repeated surgeries can significantly enhance the quality of life for haemodialysis patients. This project underscores the importance of considering patient well-being alongside the extension of life. Future directions include broader implementation of less invasive techniques and ongoing evaluation of their impact on patient outcomes.